Mike and Allen discuss the implications of theYahoo-eBay partnership announced this week. Is it a partnership that could have been forged awhile ago or an alliance necessitated by today's circumstances.

|
|
||||
|
This Month
Month Archive
Login
|
Friday, May 26
by
m2
on Fri 26 May 2006 07:26 AM MST
Monday, May 22
by
m2
on Mon 22 May 2006 06:54 AM MST
In this installment, Mike and Allen talk about Yahoo in Google in the wake of their respective analyst/press days. Wednesday, April 19
by
m2
on Wed 19 Apr 2006 09:51 PM MST
In today's installment, Mike and Allen trade shots over a curious new addition to Yahoo's stable of beta products, Yahoo Answers. What does it mean to extend to the online world the physical world experience of asking a general question to a group of people? We try to provide . . . an answer.
Wednesday, January 25
by
m2
on Wed 25 Jan 2006 06:30 PM MST
In today's installment, Allen and Mike 'cast about the evolving online video market -- a subject we'll be returning to regularly. For today, we'll focus on Apple's iTunes vs. Google's online video offering. Will consumer-created content be a deciding factor in who owns the online video market? Saturday, January 14
by
Allen Weiner
on Sat 14 Jan 2006 09:02 AM MST
I am a big fan of Widgets. In fact, when Apple first showed me its Widget engine, I saw it as the ultimate ability for a user to bypass funky Web browsers and connect directly to content. After Yahoo! bought Konfabulator, it was only a matter of time before it launched a full-scale Widget service. Here it is
Tuesday, December 20
by
Allen Weiner
on Tue 20 Dec 2005 09:03 AM PST
Yahoo! launched a new search shortcut today, the details of which can be found on the Yahoo! blog. Essentially, it allows you to type in “shortcut” in the search box to take the stress off of your tired fingers. A keystroke here, a keystroke there…maybe you can ward off carpal tunnel a few more years. My favorite shortcut is the one that literally starts with a bang (!). One that starts with a bang can take you directly to a given website. I made one called !Wot that takes me to this site. Maybe I am missing something. I’d much rather have Yahoo! incorporate these shortcuts with Konfabulator to allow me to create graphical desktop shortcuts that avoid the search box altogether. Saturday, December 17
by
Allen Weiner
on Sat 17 Dec 2005 10:56 AM PST
If published reports are true, the intrigue surrounding the AOL-MSN-Time Warner-Google courtship has reached a conclusion: Google will buy a 5% stake in AOL and remain AOL’s primary source for advertising. MSN becomes the bridesmaid and Yahoo! (who was never seriously in the mix) moves along its separate path of Internet media dominance. There are many moving parts here: 1. Google may covet AOL’s large base of email and IM users. The conversion process from aol.com addresses to gmail and Google Talk accounts could be relatively easy given Google’s technological savvy. Such a move puts Google on par with Yahoo! And MSN (Hotmail) in the vital path of creating a communications layer that allows users to store, subscribe to and share content. 2. Given AOL.com’s path toward becoming the leading video portal, Google will accelerate its play in the business of extending its ad platform to deliver ads to video clips and Podcasts. This would challenge such players sas Lightningcast and Eyeblaster in this space. Also, it puts pressure on Yahoo! to move quickly to extend its ad platform. 3. This puts AOL’s dial-up business into the spotlight. With this move further down the .com path, what is the company to do with its approximately 19 million dial-up customers? A likely scenario is for AOL to offer its dial-up customers on a discounted basis to Verizon, SBC, etc.. and allow the telcos to offer former dial-up users their “768” DSL service that sells for $14.95 a month. There are some issues here given some of the existing relationships between Yahoo! & MSN with the telcos. Yahoo! is not likely to respond with anything major. For MSN, in the midst of another reorg which again puts its Portal strategy in play, we’re likely to see an acceleration in its Windows Live efforts to keep pace with its competitors. Thursday, December 15
by
Allen Weiner
on Thu 15 Dec 2005 10:00 AM PST
After seeing the top searches from Yahoo! for 2005, I think it’s time for me to go on vacation and get-reoriented to the real world. There are no top searches from the world of politics, critical world affairs or even such events as Hurricane Katrina. It makes you wonder if anyone over the age of 15 searches the Web. The Yahoo! Search 2005 Overall Top 10 Searches: 1. Britney Spears 2. 50 Cent 3. Cartoon Network 4. Mariah Carey 5. Green Day 6. Jessica Simpson 7. 8. Eminem 9. Ciara 10. Lindsay Lohan Monday, December 5
by
Allen Weiner
on Mon 05 Dec 2005 07:52 AM PST
As Mike and I mentioned on our most recent MADCast, we are crazy about Yahoo!’s new RSS feed reader which is baked into the Beta client of the new Yahoo! Mail (hopefully coming soon to a PC near you). Today, if you go to Inform, you can create your own customized RSS feeds (and, of course loading them into your Yahoo! mail client). You need to do a search at which point you can follow a few steps and generate an RSS feed. You cut and paste the feed script into your reader of choice, and away you go. It’s especially useful for topics that don’t have a natural RSS feed. Worth a try. Tuesday, November 22
by
Allen Weiner
on Tue 22 Nov 2005 07:52 AM PST
The power of rich media search is growing. I am trying to put these pieces together: Barry Diller is now on Brightcove’s board coupled with IAC/Ask Jeeves’ newly announced deal with Go Fish, a rich media search platform. Diller is CEO of IAC. Factor in the news that AOL—a new partner of Brightcove—owns Singingfish, a powerful rich media search engine that competes with Go Fish. Friends, partners, competitors. Where have we seen this before? Wednesday, November 16
by
Allen Weiner
on Wed 16 Nov 2005 10:03 AM PST
Google officially announced Google Base today (see below). My take? Well, it’s party eBay, part Craigslist and part this crazy Web 2.0 notion where every tags his/her own content and everyone else adds their tags along the way. At this point, the community tagging is missing here, but I am sure it’s to come. Also, it appears to be part of Google’s “open” strategy in that the company applies as few limiting standards are possible to cut down on the typical friction required to get anything done on the Web. It’s like the company’s IM strategy in which it used an open (XMPP) standard to encourage as many developers and third parties to become part of the federation. Google can afford this approach because of its massive ad revenue flow. It will get even better for Google once it opens up the Google Wallet as a payment scheme. That has to be coming soon as well. Google Base is an extension of Google’s existing content collection efforts such as our traditional web crawl system, as well as Google Sitemaps, Google Print and Google Video – all which enable content owners to easily make their information searchable via Google. The goal of Google Base is to improve the overall quality and breadth of Google Search results by collecting even more information about a wider diversity of content. Similar to a database, Google Base enables content owners to describe and assign attributes to it the information they upload and uses this meta-data to better target search results to what users are looking for. For example, if a chef chooses to upload their very best recipe for tamales he/she can further describe that recipe with a photo or by assigning attributes such as “medium-spicy” or “spicy.” When a user searches for the word [tamale recipes] from the Google Base homepage they will be presented with a list of recipe results accompanied by a list attributes at the top of page which enable them to further refine their search to “medium-spicy” or “hot” tamale recipes. Google Base also creates a new opportunity for content producers to submit any kind of information even if it’s not a web page or online. This could range from an old family photograph to a large database of museum artifacts both of which may not have been previously accessible online. As part of the early-stage beta, Google has been working with a variety of commercial and non-commercial information providers. Some of which include:
Thursday, October 27
by
m2
on Thu 27 Oct 2005 06:02 PM PDT
Allen and Mike take on recent announcements from Microsoft and others that outlined various efforts to digitize and make searchable all the print material that exists, and then some.
Monday, September 26
by
m2
on Mon 26 Sep 2005 05:25 PM PDT
Today's 'cast is a condensed version of conversations Allen and Mike have. Conversations that typically start something like, "Dude, I just saw the coolest thing . . . " Clipmarks, FilmLoop and others crop up in the conversation. Tuesday, August 30
by
m2
on Tue 30 Aug 2005 06:10 PM PDT
Allen and Mike discuss the differences between social networking and social search. And there are differences. Social-search is the emergence of how consumers find and rate everything from Vietnamese restautrants to political coverage etc. More to the point, out of social-search comes an important requirement -- and an opportunity for creating ranking systems that help establish an individual's credbility. Monday, August 29
by
m2
on Mon 29 Aug 2005 09:16 AM PDT
What madness is this? Allen and Mike present and then challenge the notion of Google offering a mobile phone of their own. Whether or not you agree with the notion, we think the assumptions that go into our respective opinions are food for thought. Monday, August 22
by
Allen Weiner
on Mon 22 Aug 2005 07:54 AM PDT
As if the newspaper world didn’t have enough grief. Looks like the major search titans are toying with the idea of embracing the analog world. It’s a good move as long as they figure out how to let the print guys run their business while integrating it smoothly into the search firm's digital operations. No mean task, if you ask me. Monday, August 8
by
m2
on Mon 08 Aug 2005 09:35 AM PDT
Is the CEO of a major public company -- with one of the most envied stock prices in the world -- a public figure? (We'd say so.) Shouldn't a news organization tasked with covering said company use all legitimate and legal means to seek and report information about the CEO? (Depends on what information and its context, but generally, we'd say yes, they should.) So why is Google's vaunted PR team so up in arms about the fact that a CNET (we'll always call them CNET) reporter went and used Google to find out information about it's CEO? In fact, they're so upset about such disclosures as the fact that the CEO is, gasp,a resident of Atherton, CA. And, gasp, hosted a $10,000-a-plate fund-raiser for Al Gore's failed presidential campaign. Perhaps they're too thin-skinned? Hubris? Lame? Really, this is all information available in public records (especially the fund-raising). Does being CEO of Google, or any large public company, convey some special status in terms of disclosure of personal information? We don't think so. We think such disclosures come under the heading "comes with the territory -- and the millions of $$$." Honestly, banning Google employees from speaking with CNET reporters for a year seems, well, pointless.
Friday, July 29
by
m2
on Fri 29 Jul 2005 05:10 PM PDT
Is it surprising that incumbent media titans shunned "new media" executives at an exclusive media industry gathering? Can Microsoft catch up to Google?
Tuesday, June 28
by
Allen Weiner
on Tue 28 Jun 2005 12:05 PM PDT
I think the Google Video service is a big deal. Maybe not for what we see on the site today, but where it's headed. I wrote a report (that should be free) that's posted on my company's Website.
Monday, June 20
by
Allen Weiner
on Mon 20 Jun 2005 07:46 AM PDT
The buzz is that Google is working on an online payment business to compete with Paypal. If so, it seems to me it would be to support Google's new media business. How else could they charge people to view all those uploaded videos? If you have uploaded videos, you could note that it allows the video producer to indicate that he or she wants to charge for viewing. A new payment scheme makes sense.
Tuesday, June 14
by
m2
on Tue 14 Jun 2005 04:20 PM PDT
Tuesday, May 24
by
Allen Weiner
on Tue 24 May 2005 07:33 AM PDT
This is an interesting development in the world of search. Using maps as the foundation, people can the dimension of precise location to their local searches. How to get from the airport to a nearby hotel (as Google demonstrated last week) and get a fly-by driving route? And when I click on that hotel, I can see the going rates and book a room (through a travel partner). And if the hotel wants to offer content, it could pop up when I click on the map. Mike and I discussed this on yesterday’s MADCast. It’s cool. Is it market changing? Hmmm.. not sure. It seems like a feature that might be too advanced for most of today’s average searchers. I agree with the comment in this article from the founder of Mapquest: value added content might be more important to a consumer than whiz-bang technology (just for the sake of technology). Will I use it to find out the route to the local theater? Doubtful—I probably know the way. Will I use it to see my home up close and personal? Maybe…once. Will I use it to go celebrity home spotting? Probably not, unless I can see the celeb in the house in real time (which this does not do). At this point, I am putting this in the cool/nice to have bucket. Will it become must have? Maybe, but it won’t happen overnight. The supporting “reasons” to use it will have to greatly evolve. |
|||